Dragon Kills/iStock via Getty Images
Nvidia is being challenged.
I believe NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) The gap is huge at the moment, but it appears to have a critical weakness, which smart researchers and well-funded upstarts are beginning to explore. on investment. Nvidia initially designed its GPUs and CPUs for tasks that weren't AI-specific. The compute power it provided was translatable to deep learning capabilities and other AI tasks, putting Nvidia in a particularly strong position as demand for AI began to grow rapidly. However, the key point here is that it developed its own critical infrastructure designed to compute tasks not specifically designed for AI. That doesn't mean Nvidia isn't aware of it. They are and will continue to do everything in their power to develop systems and infrastructure that commit to an AI-first focus. Future developed units. For example, Nvidia continues to develop its Tensor Cores, which are specialized processing units inside Nvidia's GPUs for handling AI workloads. google (GOOG)(Google) also offers Tensor Processing Units, which are application-specific integrated circuits ('ASICs') designed to work with Google's own machine learning framework and offered to third parties but the cloud. Data centers through based services However, there is still some window of opportunity for new companies to potentially capture a share of the market if they challenge Nvidia, Google, and other leading technology firms, particularly in AI work. Challenge yourself to develop chips designed for load. The key competitive advantage these AI-specific chips will have is performance in AI workloads, which is a huge selling point as consumers begin to expect faster results from AI systems. It's unlikely for a company much smaller than Nvidia to do this effectively, but it takes the right teams with the right funding and the right ingenuity, in my opinion, to properly demonstrate these designs. be able to and then adopt them on a large scale. Scale
The likes of Groq and other less obvious upstarts are already doing this. But to my mind and my research, Groq seems to be at the top here and should offer a pretty formidable competitor to Nvidia in the AI market for years to come. It features a tensor streaming processor architecture, which provides a fixed, software-defined approach, unlike traditional GPUs and CPUs. This reduces latency and increases performance. Additionally, its single-core design allows for high-speed data processing, making it more attractive for AI computations. Groq's chips are designed to offer faster performance in certain AI tasks than traditional GPUs, as they are designed to perform trillions of operations per second.
Other notable Nvidia competitors include Cerebras and SambaNova. Cerebras offers a very powerful single-chip processor, and SambaNova offers an integrated hardware and software system powered by AI-specific chips.
Cerebras has a large-scale AI chip called the Wafer Scale Engine, which is much larger than conventional chips, occupying almost an entire silicon wafer. Hence, it has an unprecedented amount of processing power and stands out as a major competitor. Its latest version, called Wafer Scale Engine 2, contains 2.6 trillion transistors and 850,000 cores, making it the largest chip ever made. It allows for quick and efficient AI tasks by minimizing data movement.
Samba Nova's data-scale system integrates hardware and software solutions powered by chips using its reconfigurable data flow architecture. It allows for adaptive, scalable AI processing and is attractive because it provides flexibility to enterprises that require different levels of compute at specific times depending on the needs of their machine learning tasks. There are
We should note that Nvidia is not going to be knocked out of the top position in AI infrastructure because of its growing gap, but rather the market share that is focused on a large momentary gap in Nvidia's strategic focus, which it now has to fill. Is. Can adjust, very well. I think the challenge is going to be whether companies that try to compete with Nvidia in this regard will remain viable once Nvidia adapts accordingly to technological change and reaches higher production. . I believe the only option for smaller competitors here is to focus strictly on quality. I believe the ease of design and power can compete with Nvidia, even for a long time. While Nvidia may be the biggest, it may end up not being the best.
Implications for Nvidia's assessment
If Nvidia is finally seen as the largest provider of compute infrastructure but doesn't offer the best AI-specific chips for performance, that could mean the stock is overpriced right now. Is. What Nvidia offers, which I believe is tremendous and its most important competitive advantage, is a full-stack ecosystem for high-computing tasks, including AI, which it continues to develop. This is arguably what the market wants and is asking for through very high prices. However, if suddenly Nvidia is seen as the leading provider of AI-related workloads but a secondary one, I think there could be a moderate correction in Nvidia's value. In light of this risk to Nvidia, I think some caution is warranted for Nvidia shareholders in the short to medium term. My own view is that Nvidia is currently undervalued based on the world's long-term dependence on Nvidia's ecosystem, but in the short to medium term, the stock's valuation can be viewed as highly optimistic. . Given that Nvidia has some notable competitors emerging that will be moderately disruptive, but with considerable success, the idea of Nvidia being such a dominant provider of quality in AI workloads. However, Nvidia's ongoing innovation and AI integration may mitigate these risks, especially given its funding strength compared to smaller and newer companies.
Nvidia's long-term strengths
I think Jensen Huang is an exceptional entrepreneur and executive. This has influenced many of my own thoughts and actions and is well-documented, stating that he actively seeks out and evaluates Nvidia's competition on a daily basis because he feels It is true that other companies are trying to take Nvidia's dominant position in the market. this. To me, that pretty powerfully represents how other upstarts are being treated, and I believe its ethos is the basis for the large and growing chasm Nvidia shareholders are accustomed to. Nvidia is, without exaggeration, a phenomenal company.
As I touched on in my operations analysis above, I believe Nvidia's core strength lies in its full-stack ecosystem. In this area, I believe it will be essentially impossible for competitors to effectively compete for market share with Nvidia in any meaningful way. That's why I think Mr. Huang has done such a good job of cementing and solidifying Nvidia's position as the most innovative (and well-funded) technology company developing AI tools. This is why I believe Nvidia is a fantastic long-term buy.
I believe Nvidia's CUDA deserves a special mention here, as it is the architecture that allows a whole range of users to enable Nvidia's GPUs for general purpose processing. In my opinion, this is incredibly smart for Nvidia, as it allows them to harness the power of their units for multiple purposes through integration with software. What it does do is democratize the power of Nvidia's hardware infrastructure, but what Groq and other upstarts might be able to do is focus on AI-specific workloads and design hardware that's just Focused on these tasks. Of course, it will be faster than moderately high-powered units for various workloads, AI being one of them. However, the versatility of general-purpose GPUs offers wider applicability, which is also important in environments that require multiple types of workloads simultaneously.
While Nvidia faces competition from AMD ( AMD ), which has also developed an AI ecosystem called ROCm, AMD's platform is notably less comprehensive and currently lacks an AI-specific feature set. Nvidia does. Instead, AMD's primary competitive focus is on its chip designs to deliver high-performance computing at a competitive price. AMD is still looking to improve its GPU capabilities and ROCm ecosystem to support AI and machine learning workloads. In some cases, if AMD smartly focuses on AI chip development, as Groq has, it could have a more significant competitive advantage over Nvidia. However, this should not be taken to mean that AMD is trying to strategically balance its AI focus across its total product portfolio in general. AMD, like Nvidia, wasn't an AI company to begin with.
Key takeaway
While Nvidia leads the field in AI computation infrastructure, a head start for innovators to catch up on Nvidia's chip configurations has become apparent. In the near future, I see it possible that Nvidia will be seen as the biggest and best AI development ecosystem, but it may find itself, at least for a period, dominated by smaller firms. Chip designs will stand out compared to those that are directly focused on. Quality of chips and units designed specifically for AI. At the end of the day, Nvidia wasn't an AI company first; It may take a company dedicated to AI from the start to really deliver the quality that the consumer AI market is demanding.